Meaning and Dialogue Coherence: A Proof-theoretic Investigation (workshop paper version)

نویسنده

  • Paul Piwek
چکیده

This paper presents a novel proof-theoretic account of dialogue coherence. It focuses on cooperative information-oriented dialogues and describes how the structure of such dialogues can be accounted for in terms of a multi-agent hybrid inference system that mixes natural deduction with information transfer and observation. We show how the structure of dialogue arises out of the interplay between the inferential roles of logical connectives (i.e., sentence semantics), a rule for transferring information between agents, and rules for information flow between agents and their environment. Our order of explanation is opposite in direction to that adopted in the game-theoretic semantics tradition, where sentence semantics (or a notion of valid inferences) is derived from (winning) dialogue strategies. The approaches may, however, be reconcilable, since we focus on cooperative dialogues, whereas the latter concentrates on adversarial dialogue.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Meaning and Dialogue Coherence: A Proof-theoretic Investigation

This paper presents a novel proof-theoretic account of dialogue coherence. It focuses on an abstract class of cooperative information-oriented dialogues and describes how their structure can be accounted for in terms of a multi-agent hybrid inference system that combines natural deduction with information transfer and observation. We show how certain dialogue structures arise out of the interpl...

متن کامل

Ribbon tensorial logic A functorial bridge between proofs and knots

Tensorial logic is a primitive logic of tensor and negation which refines linear logic by relaxing the hypothesis that tensorial negation A 7→ ¬A is involutive. The resulting logic of linear continuations provides a proof-theoretic account of game semantics, where the formulas and proofs of the logic reflect univoquely dialogue games and innocent strategies. In the present paper, we introduce a...

متن کامل

A Proof-Theoretic Semantics for Transitive Verbs with an Implicit Object

The paper presents a proof-theoretic semantics for sentences headed by transitive verbs allowing an unexpressed (implicit) object. Such sentences are shown to have the same (proof-theoretic) meaning as the same sentences with an explicit existentially quantified object something. This semantics is contrasted with a model-theoretic semantics based on truthconditions in models. The models used co...

متن کامل

Evaluation Understudy for Dialogue Coherence Models

Evaluating a dialogue system is seen as a major challenge within the dialogue research community. Due to the very nature of the task, most of the evaluation methods need a substantial amount of human involvement. Following the tradition in machine translation, summarization and discourse coherence modeling, we introduce the the idea of evaluation understudy for dialogue coherence models. Follow...

متن کامل

A proof-theoretic universal property of determiners

Determiners are the natural language (NL) analogue of quantifiers in logic. In model-theoretic semantics (MTS), their denotations are taken as binary relation over subsets of the domain of the model (see [3] for an extensive discussion). When combined with a noun-meaning, a subset of the domain, they give rise to determiner phrase (dp), which, according to the generalised quantifiers theory [1]...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006